6 May 2008, Comments (5)

About

Author: LaughingVulcan

Me (?!)

So you ask, “Who is LaughingVulcan?” Good question. Someday I’ll have a complete answer for you, but for now…

I am Darren Erickson, of Bloomington, Illinois.

As this is a Chess Blog, I’ll start there. I am a USCF member, and only just started to obtain my rating in 2010. I’ve been a member for three of the last ten years. I am also a Club level Tournament Director (an Arbiter of the USCF for international readers.) I am involved with our local chess club (Twin City Chess Club, meeting at Colley’s Chess Cafe,) our scholastic chess organization (BNASC,) and play Correspondence Chess via IECC. I’ve worked as both a floor and computer TD, and have directed small open tournaments all on my own. As of this edit (9/8/10,) I am one game away from having an established Regular rating. I intend by the end of September, 2010 to request the exam to raise my TD certification to the Local TD level.

I am active in the USCF Forums, user name “LaughingVulcan.”

Yes, my rating level reveals that I am not quite a woodpusher, though patzer fits nicely sometimes. So what? I enjoy my chess, and hope you do too! (Which is the important bit, to me.)

OK, when I’m not serving as an amateur minion of Caissa…. Among other things, my current work is as an Executive Assistant to the Director of Operations at a local medical practice.

I was ordained in the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America in 1997. I am no longer rostered in the ELCA as an ordained minister; although I no longer use the title, under the “once ordained always ordained” philosophy I still feel fully entitled to the honorific Reverend. I graduated Master of Divinity from Pacific Lutheran Theological Seminary in Berkeley, California, and Bachelor of Science in Business Administration from the University of Phoenix.

I am married. I deeply enjoy fishing as well as chess.

I consider myself a technogeek of the first order and a hacker by the old school definition of the word, and also the yet older definition. Although I have not been on the air in years, my Amateur Radio Callsign is KB7VPI (General Class with Code, thank you very much.) Obviously Star Trek is important to me, but I also enjoy Doctor Who from the 70s to the present, the works of William Gibson, and through my wife discovered the joy that was/is Firefly.

OK, you really want to my cred level on the piror paragraph? Try this little blast from the past:

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version 3.12
GAT d@ s>:++ a+ C++++$ U>++++$ P--- L++>$ !E-- W+++ !N !o K---- w$ O M V
PS+ PE Y+ PGP t+++ !5 X++ R+++ tv+ b++++ DI+++ G+ e+++>++++ h- r+++ z+++
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

You can decode that at this link. (For those who dare to decode it… Yes, I actually do have a Newton MessagePad, and at one point I did surf the web and do my email by cell phone on it!) Eventually I may work a javascript hack to just click that code block and be taken direct to the decode screen…. yep, that’s how bad it is. Sometimes it is hard to be a LaughingVulcan…

…but oh so fun! :D

Me (!?)

Comments (5) »

  1. OldPatzer says:

    Hi, Darren.

    About the pronunciation of “Rui Lopez”. Here’s a Web page about the name “Rui”:

    http://www.babynamespedia.com/meaning/Rui .

    At the end of the page, it explains how to pronounce “Rui” as “Roo-ee” (rhymes with “two eat”).

  2. Anthony Montalbano says:

    Hey Darren,
    I am also a Christian, enjoy fishing and relatively new to chess. I just joined the USCF and read one of your posts….thats how I found your blog! I enjoyed it!!!

  3. Thanks for the reply, Anthony! I appreciate knowing I’ve got readers!

    Hope you keep playing and also enjoying your chess! (And fishing! And the Lord!!!!)

  4. Sebastian says:

    Evening LV,
    Just thought I’d drop a line to say I enjoy the blog and keep up the good work.
    I’m a cc player myself–finally serious about it after coming to terms with the computer assistance question. What are your thoughts on the use of computers in cc?

  5. Hi, Sebastian, and thanks for the feedback! I appreciate the comments!

    Your question seems ripe for a post of it’s own! (I hope to come up with one soon… ;) )

    In the interim, though, I think I’m pretty much in what’s become the mainstream for most organizations. Assistance short of active analysis, fine. Firing up Fritz or Rybka to get the best replies to a move, or for blunderchecking, not fine. (Unless the rules of the cc group one is in allows what used to be called, “assisted chess.” But personally I wouldn’t play in such a group – if I want a computer game I’ll fire up Fritz on my computer. ;) )

    One can’t control ones opponents, and the possibility of cheating always leaves a shadow across the virtual board. Perhaps if I were a more highly rated player the allure of correspondence wouldn’t be so great – or if I do reach higher in cc perhaps the desire will dim. But I don’t think it is much of a problem at my level of play, currently. And for the – hopefully rare! – occasion where I might lose a game because I’m playing by the rules and my opponent isn’t… I’ll still derive value from the post-game analysis and my opponent will not, so I still win!

Leave a comment

XHTML– Allowed tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>